The emergency cash loans are short term loans and provided against your post dated check. This is because you have to reimburse your borrowed amount in specified time period of 31 days. If this term doesn’t suit your requirements, you can get extended it by paying nominal fee to the lender. You are also not required to pledge your collateral for securing the amount. Absence of collateral against the loan generates risk factors to lenders as they levy somewhat higher interest rate in comparison of standard loans.

Your bad credit factors don’t affect on your applying for emergency cash loans because lenders provide these aids on the borrowers’ monthly income and repayment capacity. So, before availing cash you have to meet some preconditions to fulfill. First of all, you must be 18 years of age along with UK citizen. The second, you must be fulltime employed and receive your monthly income via your active checking account. Salaried people are also sometimes in need of extra financial help to take care of sudden fiscal expenses. Then, you can apply for emergency cash loans and fetch your desirable cash on time. Money is having an essential part in one’s life. It is from time to time required by the borrowers to tackle financial emergencies. People who are fixed income holders are also at times in need of money as their monthly revenue is not workable to take care of such fiscal expenses.

Let’s kick things off with two excellent comic flip-offs:

A musician names his album, “Kevinspacey”. The real Kevin Spacey has his lawyer send a cease-and-desist letter because “Kevin Spacey” has been trademarked. (You could even do that? Huh. Another lesson learned.) And the musician’s response? Relabel his album, Evinspacey . I already want to buy the album and I know nothing about it.

Writer makes an comment about Stetson hats. Stetson sends him a letter insisting he add the ® symbol when using their brand name. What was the writer’s response? Stetson® hats suck . Hopefully, this will show the trademark attorneys that, sometimes, the best move is no move at all.

As for trademark abuses, Access Copyright claimed a trademark on the copyright symbol itself . Is there no end to the madness? Is our very DNA going to trademarked one day? As if that isn’t bad enough, Disney slapped a trademark on Seal Team 6 . As Mike put it, “I wonder if the Navy SEALs themselves will file a protest. I would imagine that you generally don’t want to be on the other side of a dispute with Navy SEALs.”

I learned more about the law this week as Mike explained how he had to file a Freedom of Information request about ICE’s anti-piracy videos . These are the kinds of posts I really look forward to because they illustrate the law in action, something few non-lawyers ever have a chance to see: …[T]he three Freedom of Information requests — filed using the new system from MuckRock.com, an open government tool that seeks to publish documents retrieved via such requests and which recently built a tool to make it easier to make such requests (which I’m now testing) — are as follows:

1. A FOIA request to the Department of Homeland Security, concerning the details of any licensing agreement with the City of New York or with NBC Universal directly.

2. A request under NY State’s Freedom of Information Law concerning details of any licensing agreement with Homeland Security concerning the same videos.

3. Separately, a second request to NYC, concerning communications between the Mayor’s Office and NBC Universal or the MPAA concerning the details behind those videos as well.

The NY State law says that the city must respond to my request within five business days. DHS has a longer period of time to respond.

It sounds small, but posts like this are a welcome reminder to me that the law isn’t a nuisance to us, but is also there to serve us; filing a FOI request is iconic of that power.

In the same vein, I was very glad to see the stories about Amazon and Google not rolling over at the government’s whim. First, Amazon says they won’t pay taxes in other states unless the government says they have to : …Jeff Bezos is claiming that such attempts to collect sales tax are unconstitutional without Congressional approval: And in the U.S., the Constitution prohibits states from interfering in interstate commerce. And there was a Supreme Court case decades ago that clarified that businesses — it was mail-order at that time because the Internet did not exist — that mail-order companies could not be required to collect sales tax in states where they didn’t have what’s called “nexus.”

And that’s a very clear decision.

This is, of course, entirely accurate. I’ve often wondered how Amazon was going to handle states demanding back taxes on sales within their borders. Always seemed like a sticky issue to me, and one which keeps cropping up in different ways. For example, Virgin’s Megastore on the Champs Ellysees in Paris, France stayed open on weekends and the French government was fielding complaints from local shop owners who said they couldn’t possibly compete with a big superstore like Virgin being open on Sundays. So the French government threatened Virgin with a big fine (if memory serves, it was about $100,000 a day) if they stayed open on Sundays. What did Virgin do? They stayed open. I can’t recall how long they stayed open like that, but it seemed incredibly intrusive to me that the government would step in to prevent one business from competing in that way. In Amazon’s case, it’s the states who want a cut of Amazon’s sales because they feel it’s stealing business away from their state. But hey, too bad . Find a better way to draw customers to make purchases in state so you can keep your taxes. Don’t go whining about how Big Bad Amazon is a moustache-twirling tax evader. Quite on the contrary, Amazon is saying they would pay taxes for interstate commerce: Bezos also points out that Amazon would be perfectly happy with Congress stepping in and creating a sales tax system that works across states. You have to hand it to Amazon. They know the law, they know their rights, and they’re enforcing it. I welcome that. But the reason why this article is my favorite article on Techdirt, but not my favorite article on Slashdot, is the commentary: “This is, of course, entirely accurate.” Were it not for that single trailing line, that I know is coming from a well-read lawyer, I might have read that Slashdot article and been clueless. Is Bezos exaggerating? Is he twisting the law to suit his needs? Who would know the answer? Techdirt is, bar none, a supremo bullshit detector.

Also great to see is Google’s claim that they would fight PROTECT IP if it were passed because it would be disastrous to free speech. Most of the time I find that I’m against some new proposed law but I can’t quite express why. As ever, Mike does it effortlessly: …those in favor of PROTECT IP don’t seem to understand the technology that they’re regulating. So they don’t realize that they’re trying to create a “simple solution to complex problems,” and don’t recognize that they’re effectively breaking the internet and infringing on free speech rights. It’s not because they don’t like free speech. It’s because they don’t understand what they’re doing, and lobbyists for the entertainment industry insist this is needed to “fight piracy.” The problem is that this won’t “fight piracy” and will have massive unintended consequences. It’s good that Google is willing to make this an issue. I also got a weekly dose of lessons about statistics and economics from Techdirt as these two articles show. First, we have the superb, How To Lie With Statistics: France Pretends Hadopi Law Is Working . I lived eight years in France so I know a little something about how French culture works — watching Hadopi unfold has been, for me, one part anguish and two parts interminable laughter. France seems to have a long history of its citizens electing their representatives… then rebelling against them. Yes, this is of course an imperfect over-generalization, but there is a measure of truth in it. On the one hand, the French respect authority, but on the other hand, they like to rebel against it. Hadopi is a classic case of a government program enforcing its top-down will on a people determined to disregard it. So it’s no surprise to me that the actual data from Hadopi might be overstated. As Mike put it: The government and various agencies are running around touting the claim that, according to their survey the HADOPI law has convinced more than 50% of users to stop file sharing. Problem is, that’s not what the data really says. The real data shows that of people surveyed only 7% said either they “or someone close” had received a warning letter. Now, of those 7%, 50% claimed that they would stop infringing. Now, if you’re playing along with the home game, you should have quickly realized that the actual percentage of people surveyed is more like 3.5% — and I could argue that it’s even lower for a few key reasons: The key question asked wasn’t whether the individual would stop file sharing, but whether or not they or someone close to them had. Suddenly you have a big statistical problem, because — to take an extreme example — let’s say that everyone in a town knows the one big file sharer who shares content online, but no one else in the town does. And, that guy knows and makes it clear that if he gets an injunction, he’ll stop. Now, since everyone knows this guy, the reports from that town would be that 100% of people receive letters and 100% of those recipients would stop using P2P, even if that wasn’t true at all. Including the “or someone close to you” makes the effective data pretty close to useless, because there’s no way to separate out the overlap. The whole thing is based on a survey, which is notoriously unreliable in getting accurate data. People quite frequently answer what they think others want them to say, rather than what they’re really thinking. And, when asking them if they’ll stop engaging in illegal activity, many are simply going to say yes, even if they have no intention to follow through. That first point reminded me of confirmed kills in war. If twenty people each saw the same person get killed and report that same person as a separate kill, the estimated dead can be a grossly inflated number. Yet one more lesson I learned about how to question statistical claims. Seems like the best way to assure a solid number is to have statistics done by your most skeptical opponents.

The piece on Limewire was also a gratifying read. Recorded music sales are up after Limewire was shut down , so that must mean mission accomplished, right? Well, actually, no. Doesn’t look like that at all. In fact, Nielsen doesn’t even mention LimeWire’s shutdown in its note about this, attributing much of the increase to the Beatles finally coming to iTunes. And, actually, if you look at the same Nielsen reports going all the way back to 2006, they show music sales going up each year. It’s just that more of it is single tracks, rather than full overpriced albums. And finally, three “classic” Techdirt articles. First, I loved how Mike wrote about Jonathan Coulton, an unsigned musician, who made $500,000 last year . How many exceptions must we list before we show that it’s possible to make your own success if you understand business models and give fans what they want?

Second, the story of how Apple essentially gave the iFlow app developers an eviction notice : …Apple is now requiring us, as well as all other ebook sellers, to give them 30% of the selling price of any ebook that we sell from our iOS app. Unfortunately, because of the “agency model” that has been adopted by the largest publishers, our gross margin on ebooks after paying the wholesaler is less than 30%, which means that we would have to take a loss on all ebooks sold. This is not a sustainable business model. The iFlow developers go on to say they felt they did everything they could to ensure Apple was okay with their product, but then find out later that iBooks had been in development, and that Apple must have known about this conflict all along. Instead of Apple telling them outright, Apple effectively “jacked up the rents” so that it made no financial sense to stick around anymore. Rightly so, the iFlow app makers are furious. However, as Mike notes: “…[T]his really shouldn’t be too surprising. When you’re making a bet on a closed system and relying entirely on that, it’s inevitable that there are going to be issues. It’s one of the reasons why we keep hearing more and more developers wanting to move away from developing native iOS apps towards developing more open standard apps, such as in HTML 5. Not only does it make it easier to build cross platform apps, but it also means they’re not completely at the whims of a single company that’s been known to reverse direction with little notice.

Finally, the story of the faux children’s ebook that rocked the web . I personally received a copy of this ebook and was laughing so hard that, before I’d even finished reading it, I was already forwarding it to every parent I knew. Only after I’d hit the SEND button did it occur to me that I might have committed copyright infringement. While reading the Techdirt piece, I was happy to see that the hardcover book had reached #1 on Amazon, but also dismayed when I read, “Despite all of this, Akashic appears to believe that it’s still in its best interests to go after those hosting copies of the PDF or graphics, and have them take it down.” Wha??? Nobody even knew about this book before the pirated copies were distributed. Obscurity… piracy… obscurity… piracy… I choose obscurity!

These three posts were classic Techdirt because they pound at the heart of why businesses work or don’t work in this new Digital Age: pre-internet, neither Coulton nor the children’s ebook could have been as successful, and the iFlow developers made a fatal judgement about building their castle in someone else’s walled garden. These stories all illustrate the insane power of the internet, but also how a clear understanding of how business models function in the changing marketplace provide an indispensable advantage over one’s competition. Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

View full post on All Stories

United States (AHN Entertainment) – 96 minutes

In theaters May 13, 2011

Rating: R, Comedy-drama

Everything Must Go isn’t just the title of Will Ferrell’s likable new movie. It’s also his acting strategy in this minimalist, bittersweet dramedy in which he strips away all the tricks of his trade as a glorious goofball in the service of delivering a calibrated dramatic performance.

He’s terrific. And we really shouldn’t be surprised.

After all, we got a glimpse of his ability to handle drama in his wonderfully deadpan, underplayed turn in Stranger Than Fiction. And his range and versatility were more than established in films like Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy and The Producers, to say nothing of his impressive run on TV’s Saturday Night Live.

In Everything Must Go, which is loosely based on a short story by Raymond Carver called Why Don’t You Dance?, Ferrell carries the modestly-scaled and grounded-in-reality film as an ordinary guy whose life simply falls apart one day.

His Nick Halsey is an alcoholic who is fired from his sales executive’s job for falling off the proverbial wagon. Again.

So he goes home, only to discover that his wife has left him, changed the locks on their suburban Arizona home, canceled his credit cards, shut off his cell phone, and dumped all his worldly possessions on the front lawn.

So he decides simply to live on his lawn for a stretch and, while he’s at it, to conduct a yard sale to get rid of all his stuff, there being not much of a reason, given the precipitous drop in his overall expectations, to keep all or even any of it. And as he lets go of his possessions, such as they are, he also arrives at a new vantage point from which he can look in a mirror and begin to rebuild a new sense of self.

Two neighbors stop by and get to know him.

Christopher Jordan Wallace plays Kenny, a lonely and downbeat latchkey kid from the neighborhood whom Nick hires as an assistant yard-sale agent. And Rebecca Hall is Samantha, a pregnant newlywed who has just moved in across the street in advance of her husband, who has been transferred for his job. She can see Nick’s predicament every time she glances out the window, and Nick initiates an ever-so-slightly-flirtatious conversation or two with her.

Nick also hears from his Alcoholics Anonymous sponsor, a police detective played by Michael Pena, who informs him that he can remain on his cluttered and unsightly lawn for five days, after which he’ll be carted off to jail for vagrancy. And Nick drops in unannounced on a woman he hasn’t seen since high school, played by Laura Dern, on whom Nick had a crush quite a few years ago and whose current life also has a certain measure of disarray.

None of these relationships dulls the pain, reverses the damage, dilutes the despair, or pulls him out of his depression. But at least he’s having human contact.

Ferrell abandons the abandon in EMG, bringing subtlety and nuance to Nick, a rather passive and sometimes blunt-to-the-point-of-insensitive guy who’s actually rather well-behaved when you consider the relentlessness of his beer drinking. He knows he has screwed up his life and he’s trying to cover — that is, submerge in liquid — the obvious pain he’s in, and Ferrell conveys all that naturally, never resorting to anything even vaguely resembling comedic shtick.

Oh, don’t worry, Ferrell’s still funny when he needs to be, but not in a showy way. He does it slyly and appropriately, without ever breaking character by contradicting Nick’s essential numbness in a chase for a laugh. Ferrell’s willing to settle for sad, knowing smiles and he gets his share.

First-time writer-director Dan Rush’s low-key, acutely observed piece certainly benefits from Ferrell’s involvement, both commercially and artistically. But it also provides Ferrell with a means of reminding the world of what else he might be capable of.

Everything Must Go is a darkly humorous, delicately balanced, and serious-minded Ferrell vehicle. In this case, where there’s a Will, there’s a way-to-go.

View full post on All Stories

View full post on All Stories

View full post on All Stories

People who are unwaged have complication in borrowing money through traditional banks, as they now can pay the way for easy cash by filling up an online application form on internet. You have to give your manually details in the form rightfully and submit it immediately. Once the lender will verify your given details, the cash will get transited into your bank account on same day of application. You have quick cash on hand and pay off your medical bills, electric bills, pay off the previous credit card debts, education fees of your child, purchase groceries and so forth.

Keeping enforced requirements of recently unemployed people. Instant cash loans for unemployed have been designed for them as they can make money with these loans to fill the gap between two posts without any restriction. Such borrowers do not need to put anything like job proof and collateral aligned with the loan. They can derive the amount ranges of 100 – 1500 for the repayment term of 14 – 30 days. The interest rate charged is bit high as security for the loan is not involved, but interest rate is negotiated on internet. That’s all you have to make a systematic research for the best loan online fiscal market and you can certainly afford the best deal that suites your budget.

Washington, D.C., United States (KaiserHealth) – Imagine that you’ve just been told you have only a short time to live. What would you want your family and community to remember most about you? In St. Louis, a hospice program called Lumina helps patients leave statements that go beyond a simple goodbye.

Suzanne Doyle, the founder of Lumina at BJC Hospice, sits quietly thumbing through a stack of books and photo albums she helped create.

Her eyes begin to moisten as she recalls a recent patient, Courtney Strain, who died of brain cancer last summer at the age of 25. In the months before Strain died, she met weekly with Doyle. In those meetings, Strain revealed one constant frustration: feeling like an outcast. People didn’t know what to say to her, she told Doyle, so they said nothing at all.

“I said, ‘You know, I’m thinking, Courtney, that you can be a teacher,’” Doyle says. “‘You know what people, not just your age, but all dying people, need. … And I wonder if we can’t come up with some kind of teaching tool.’”

Helping A Loved One Face The End Of Life

One of the things Courtney Strain left behind was this simple guide for the family and friends of people who are dying. Here are some of the things she wanted people to know:

Hallmark doesn’t fix it all. … Write a letter or send an email. … [Talk to me when] I’m strong enough to sit and laugh or cry with you …

Don’t pretend that everything is going to be OK.

Don’t abandon me at my most vulnerable time. … Sit and pray with me. Don’t just pray for me.

Don’t treat me like a child – even a well-loved child. … Include me in decisions that affect our family or social group …

Instead of asking, “What can I do for you?” offer some concrete suggestions – like bringing a meal or treat, or running errands …

Respect my decisions about my health care – my doctors, my medications and my treatments – and about my end-of-life plans …

Just because I’m dying doesn’t mean I’m any less capable of being your friend. Dying isn’t my whole identity.

Credit: “What You Can Do When A Friend (Like Me) Faces The End Of Life,” BJC Palliative Home Care and Hospice

The teaching tool they completed together is a simple guide they called “What You Can Do When a Friend (Like Me) Faces the End of Life.” Strain’s mother, Becky Brooks, says Lumina gave her daughter a voice at the end of her young life.

“You really need someone outside the scope of family and friends to help you, and to be a sounding board, and for you to say the things that sometimes aren’t so nice to hear,” she says. “That was really empowering for her.”

Experts say honoring someone’s life and legacy has always been part of the hospice philosophy. There are 25 volunteers with the Lumina program, and most are not trained medical personnel. Instead, they’re storytellers who learn how to interview dying people so they can help them leave tangible statements of values and legacy – books, CDs, photo albums, letters.

Volunteer Susan Kissinger says it’s difficult and emotional work. She helped a middle-aged ALS patient write a series of letters to his wife and kids before he died. But Kissinger says it’s a gift to be let into hospice patients’ lives.

“There will be times when the emotion will rise up,” Kissinger says. “And I guess that’s just a gift I have to offer: I can just be present here and accept the gift without being overwhelmed.”

As expected, volunteers often form deep bonds with hospice patients.

Connie McIntyre met with 84-year-old Adell Durant once a week for about eight months. Durant grew up in Mississippi. Her sister died at a young age, and Durant lost all contact with her nieces and nephews, which was a great source of sadness for her. So McIntyre got in touch with the local paper in Durant’s hometown, and it ran a photograph of Durant’s lost family.

“Within days, she started getting phone calls from various people who knew the family and who were sharing information, and then eventually from family members,” McIntyre recalls. “And she reconnected, which was one of the highest joys of her last months.”

Between the summer and fall of 2009, Durant was able to talk and visit with her newfound family. In her final Lumina recording, dated Nov. 12, 2009, she expressed her gratitude to McIntyre.

“My life would not have been what it is now if it hadn’t been for her,” Durant said in that recording, “because she brought my family together, with me praying and she calling the company, getting the pictures in the paper. Because I didn’t really know how to do it by myself. That’s what you call a friend.”

Durant died on Dec. 1, 2009. Her recordings were given to her family as a legacy to be shared with future generations.

– Provided by Kaiser Health News.

View full post on All Stories